PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3R.DE achieves a 22.51% return, which is significantly lower than QDVA.DE's 30.20% return.


IS3R.DE

1D
-1.01%
1M
6.72%
YTD
22.51%
6M
23.47%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
15.31%

QDVA.DE

1D
-2.00%
1M
12.85%
YTD
30.20%
6M
30.17%
1Y
37.02%
3Y*
28.68%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3R.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.51%8.37%37.95%8.09%-13.60%24.50%16.41%31.50%0.27%16.07%
QDVA.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
30.20%5.11%40.00%5.98%-13.66%22.93%17.39%31.13%1.12%20.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3R.DE and QDVA.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016

0.96

The correlation between IS3R.DE and QDVA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3R.DE
IS3R.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IS3R.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVA.DE
QDVA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3R.DEQDVA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.89

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

12.67

+0.62

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3R.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the QDVA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3R.DE and QDVA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3R.DEQDVA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.96

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.83

+0.02

Drawdowns

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3R.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.77%, smaller than the maximum QDVA.DE drawdown of -33.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3R.DE and QDVA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3R.DEQDVA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.77%

-33.34%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-9.48%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.57%

-25.56%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.57%

-25.56%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-2.00%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-6.84%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.91%

-0.55%

Volatility

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE) is 5.96%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that IS3R.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3R.DEQDVA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

7.65%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

15.66%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

18.82%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

19.11%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

19.19%

-1.96%

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3R.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS3R.DE vs. QDVA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3R.DE nor QDVA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IS3R.DE and QDVA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDVA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IS3R.DE.

IS3R.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while QDVA.DE tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IS3R.DE and 0.20% for QDVA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3R.DE and QDVA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer