PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3Q.DE achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly lower than IBCZ.DE's 13.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IS3Q.DE having a 12.05% annualized return and IBCZ.DE not far behind at 11.45%.


IS3Q.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
3.07%
YTD
9.47%
6M
9.57%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
12.05%

IBCZ.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.09%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.32%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3Q.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
9.47%2.80%23.78%21.70%-14.84%34.28%4.44%33.90%-3.45%8.34%
IBCZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.04%12.05%24.09%11.45%-10.83%31.27%0.44%24.79%-8.31%11.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3Q.DE and IBCZ.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015

0.94

The correlation between IS3Q.DE and IBCZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3Q.DE
IS3Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCZ.DE
IBCZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3Q.DEIBCZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

5.23

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

20.97

-9.17

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3Q.DE and IBCZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3Q.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.42

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.75

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.69

+0.08

Drawdowns

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3Q.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3Q.DE and IBCZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3Q.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-33.99%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-5.29%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-19.98%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.63%

-19.98%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-33.99%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.60%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-4.52%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.32%

+0.28%

Volatility

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) is 2.37%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that IS3Q.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3Q.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

3.05%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.31%

8.16%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

11.42%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

14.11%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

15.13%

-0.24%

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3Q.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCZ.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3Q.DE nor IBCZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3Q.DE and IBCZ.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3Q.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3Q.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.

IS3Q.DE tracks MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality, while IBCZ.DE tracks MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IS3Q.DE and 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3Q.DE and IBCZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer