PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) and iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3Q.DE achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly higher than IBCD.DE's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3Q.DE has outperformed IBCD.DE with an annualized return of 12.05%, while IBCD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.88% annualized return.


IS3Q.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
3.07%
YTD
9.47%
6M
9.57%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
12.05%

IBCD.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
1.19%
YTD
1.30%
6M
0.27%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
1.65%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
1.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3Q.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
9.47%2.80%23.78%21.70%-14.84%34.28%4.44%33.90%-3.45%8.34%
IBCD.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.30%-4.58%6.33%4.97%-12.66%6.14%0.35%20.25%-0.24%-6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3Q.DE and IBCD.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014

0.32

The correlation between IS3Q.DE and IBCD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (5 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3Q.DE
IS3Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCD.DE
IBCD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IBCD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) and iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3Q.DEIBCD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.09

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

0.75

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

1.78

+10.02

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the IBCD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3Q.DE and IBCD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3Q.DEIBCD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

0.47

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.05

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.21

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.16

+0.61

Drawdowns

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3Q.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum IBCD.DE drawdown of -41.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3Q.DE and IBCD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3Q.DEIBCD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-41.86%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-3.93%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-12.36%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.63%

-17.12%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-17.51%

-14.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-7.49%

+7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-9.84%

+5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.65%

-0.05%

Volatility

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) at 1.33%. This indicates that IS3Q.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3Q.DEIBCD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

1.33%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.31%

4.22%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

6.21%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

9.18%

+4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

9.07%

+5.82%

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3Q.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCD.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3Q.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS3Q.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCD.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.24%4.39%4.52%4.34%3.60%2.21%2.56%3.06%3.09%3.02%2.97%3.00%
IS3Q.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3Q.DE and IBCD.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCD.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCD.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IS3Q.DE.

IS3Q.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IBCD.DE is Corporate Bonds. IS3Q.DE tracks MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality, while IBCD.DE tracks iBoxx® USD Liquid Investment Grade. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IS3Q.DE and 0.20% for IBCD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3Q.DE and IBCD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer