IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L
IS3C.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)) and ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IS3C.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged), while ISF.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS3C.DE returned -0.58%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for ISF.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS3C.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for ISF.L.
Performance
IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IS3C.DE is traded in EUR, while ISF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISF.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3C.DE achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than ISF.L's 6.88% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3C.DE has underperformed ISF.L with an annualized return of -0.58%, while ISF.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.
IS3C.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.40%
- 10Y*
- -0.58%
ISF.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 6.88%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 17.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3C.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | -1.63% | 5.32% | -1.72% | 5.39% | -20.57% | -3.53% | 3.22% | 12.58% | -8.60% | 7.87% |
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.08% | 19.40% | 14.55% | 10.09% | -0.57% | 25.34% | -16.47% | 24.56% | -10.08% | 8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3C.DE and ISF.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2013 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L — Risk / Return Rank
IS3C.DE
ISF.L
IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) and iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3C.DE | ISF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.28 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 2.29 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 8.10 | -6.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3C.DE | ISF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.53 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | 0.84 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.48 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.26 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3C.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.78%, smaller than the maximum ISF.L drawdown of -57.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3C.DE and ISF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3C.DE | ISF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.78% | -57.98% | +27.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.62% | -7.79% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | -15.84% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.47% | -15.84% | -14.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.78% | -39.60% | +8.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.90% | -2.77% | -15.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -11.92% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.21% | -0.42% |
Volatility
IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) is 2.10%, while iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that IS3C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3C.DE | ISF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 4.23% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.14% | 9.79% | -4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.18% | 11.71% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 13.85% | -4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.30% | 16.62% | -7.32% |
IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3C.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ISF.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS3C.DE vs. ISF.L - Dividend Comparison
IS3C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3C.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 5.39% | 3.93% | 3.85% | 4.77% | 5.76% | 3.88% | 5.34% | 4.72% |
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.86% | 3.01% | 3.71% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3C.DE and ISF.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISF.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISF.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while ISF.L is Europe Equities. IS3C.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged), while ISF.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS3C.DE and 0.07% for ISF.L.
Find the right allocation for IS3C.DE and ISF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer