IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE
IS3C.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)) and FRCK.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - IS3C.DE tracks the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged) while FRCK.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS3C.DE returned -0.58%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for FRCK.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IS3C.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FRCK.DE.
Performance
IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3C.DE achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than FRCK.DE's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3C.DE has underperformed FRCK.DE with an annualized return of -0.58%, while FRCK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 1.49% annualized return.
IS3C.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.40%
- 10Y*
- -0.58%
FRCK.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3C.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | -1.63% | 5.32% | -1.72% | 5.39% | -20.57% | -3.53% | 3.22% | 12.58% | -8.60% | 7.87% |
FRCK.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 1.67% | 12.81% | 5.36% | 9.70% | -22.07% | -3.88% | 2.79% | 11.04% | -7.01% | 8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3C.DE and FRCK.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IS3C.DE and FRCK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3C.DE
FRCK.DE
IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3C.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.39 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 2.42 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 10.09 | -8.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3C.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.03 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | 0.02 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.16 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.17 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3C.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.78%, smaller than the maximum FRCK.DE drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3C.DE and FRCK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3C.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.78% | -32.71% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.62% | -4.49% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | -7.78% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.47% | -32.71% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.78% | -32.71% | +1.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.90% | -0.97% | -16.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -8.76% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.08% | +0.71% |
Volatility
IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) at 1.80%. This indicates that IS3C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRCK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3C.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 1.80% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.14% | 4.38% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.18% | 5.38% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 9.01% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.30% | 9.29% | +0.01% |
IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3C.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FRCK.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS3C.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS3C.DE nor FRCK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRCK.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IS3C.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 5.39% | 3.93% | 3.85% | 4.77% | 5.76% | 3.88% | 5.34% | 4.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3C.DE and FRCK.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRCK.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRCK.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged), while FRCK.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS3C.DE and 0.28% for FRCK.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS3C.DE and FRCK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer