PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3C.DE achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than EMIE.DE's -0.43% return.


IS3C.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
-1.63%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
2.01%
5Y*
-3.40%
10Y*
-0.58%

EMIE.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-2.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IS3C.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
-1.63%5.32%-1.72%5.39%-20.57%-3.53%3.22%1.85%
EMIE.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.43%7.05%-0.36%3.88%-19.72%-2.93%6.95%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3C.DE and EMIE.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019

0.80

The correlation between IS3C.DE and EMIE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3C.DE
IS3C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IS3C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EMIE.DE
EMIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3C.DEEMIE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.19

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

1.12

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

3.63

-2.11

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3C.DE and EMIE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3C.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.07

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

-0.34

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

-0.11

+0.11

Drawdowns

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3C.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.78%, which is greater than EMIE.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3C.DE and EMIE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3C.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.78%

-26.98%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.62%

-3.53%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

-6.97%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.47%

-25.83%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.90%

-14.02%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-12.69%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.09%

+0.70%

Volatility

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) at 1.28%. This indicates that IS3C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3C.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

1.28%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.14%

2.83%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.18%

3.73%

+2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.94%

6.67%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.30%

7.95%

+1.35%

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3C.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIE.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3C.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3C.DE nor EMIE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIE.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS3C.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.58%5.39%3.93%3.85%4.77%5.76%3.88%5.34%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3C.DE and EMIE.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMIE.DE is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMIE.DE is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS3C.DE.

IS3C.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged), while EMIE.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets IG ESG Diversified Bond (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS3C.DE and 0.43% for EMIE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3C.DE and EMIE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer