PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3B.DE achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3B.DE has underperformed IUSQ.DE with an annualized return of 1.25%, while IUSQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.


IS3B.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.28%
1Y
2.26%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
1.25%

IUSQ.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.68%
YTD
12.65%
6M
12.87%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3B.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF
0.39%3.53%5.28%7.82%-13.13%-0.74%2.27%6.10%-1.69%2.97%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.65%9.02%24.53%18.57%-13.58%29.13%4.94%30.14%-5.97%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3B.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2013

0.22

The correlation between IS3B.DE and IUSQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3B.DE
IS3B.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IS3B.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3B.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3B.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3B.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3B.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3B.DEIUSQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.43

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

4.08

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

16.69

-14.07

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3B.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3B.DE and IUSQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3B.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

2.31

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.88

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.82

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.76

-0.29

Drawdowns

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3B.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.06%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3B.DE and IUSQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3B.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.06%

-33.60%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-6.48%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.71%

-21.25%

+18.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.06%

-21.25%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.06%

-33.60%

+16.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.55%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-4.19%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

1.59%

-0.83%

Volatility

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) is 1.03%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that IS3B.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3B.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

3.03%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

8.26%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

11.47%

-8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.18%

13.94%

-9.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.35%

15.02%

-10.67%

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IS3B.DE and IUSQ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS3B.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS3B.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, while IUSQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS3B.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF
3.19%3.08%2.95%2.42%1.00%0.75%0.97%1.09%1.10%1.12%1.52%1.70%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3B.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3B.DE and IUSQ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IS3B.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. IS3B.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Financial, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3B.DE and IUSQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer