PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3B.DE achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBF.DE's 1.38% return.


IS3B.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.37%
1Y
2.38%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
0.60%
10Y*
1.38%

4UBF.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.46%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
-0.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IS3B.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF
1.10%3.53%5.28%7.82%-13.13%-0.29%
4UBF.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
1.38%3.23%4.51%8.22%-15.67%-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3B.DE and 4UBF.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2021

0.88

The correlation between IS3B.DE and 4UBF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3B.DE
IS3B.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IS3B.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3B.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3B.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3B.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3B.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBF.DE
4UBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS3B.DE4UBF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.12

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.86

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

2.79

+0.29

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3B.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the 4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3B.DE and 4UBF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3B.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum 4UBF.DE drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3B.DE and 4UBF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3B.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-19.99%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-2.88%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.70%

-2.88%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.05%

-19.99%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-2.18%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.94%

-8.47%

+5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.88%

-0.11%

Volatility

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) have volatilities of 0.80% and 0.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3B.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

0.79%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

3.03%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

3.68%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.19%

5.09%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.36%

5.00%

-0.64%

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3B.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS3B.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS3B.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, while 4UBF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
4UBF.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS3B.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF
3.16%3.08%2.95%2.42%1.00%0.75%0.97%1.09%1.10%1.12%1.52%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3B.DE and 4UBF.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBF.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBF.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS3B.DE.

IS3B.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Financial, while 4UBF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IS3B.DE and 0.13% for 4UBF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3B.DE and 4UBF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer