IS15.L vs. TDGB.L
IS15.L (iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IS15.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS15.L returned 2.33%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for TDGB.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS15.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.
Performance
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS15.L achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.
IS15.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- —
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS15.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF | 0.59% | 6.24% | 4.89% | 7.16% | -6.09% | -0.84% | 3.38% | 4.23% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 8.92% | 30.88% | 10.65% | 9.06% | 22.49% | 19.59% | -5.61% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS15.L and TDGB.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019 | 0.14 |
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Industrials
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Defensive
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Real Estate
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Technology
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Communication Services
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Basic Materials
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Utilities
IS15.L
TDGB.L
Energy
IS15.L
-
TDGB.L
Healthcare
IS15.L
-
TDGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
IS15.L
TDGB.L
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS15.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.59 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 6.26 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 20.72 | -11.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS15.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 3.15 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.55 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.98 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS15.L drawdown since its inception was -12.18%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS15.L and TDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS15.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.18% | -29.60% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | -4.66% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.94% | -12.41% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.18% | -12.41% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.47% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -3.70% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 1.41% | -0.91% |
Volatility
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) is 1.02%, while VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that IS15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS15.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 2.49% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 7.01% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58% | 9.28% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 11.42% | -8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.13% | 14.44% | -11.31% |
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS15.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS15.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
IS15.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS15.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF | 4.54% | 4.35% | 4.06% | 3.05% | 1.80% | 1.72% | 1.81% | 2.03% | 2.08% | 2.15% | 2.55% | 2.91% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.20% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS15.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS15.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS15.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.
IS15.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. IS15.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IS15.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.
Find the right allocation for IS15.L and TDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer