IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
IS0Z.DE (iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IS0Z.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Government AAA-AA Capped Bond, while IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS0Z.DE returned -0.58%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for IUSQ.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0Z.DE achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IS0Z.DE has underperformed IUSQ.DE with an annualized return of -0.58%, while IUSQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
IS0Z.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 0.23%
- 3Y*
- 1.18%
- 5Y*
- -2.11%
- 10Y*
- -0.58%
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 26.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0Z.DE iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.29% | -1.88% | 0.75% | 4.39% | -16.12% | -0.07% | 2.03% | 7.04% | 1.73% | -3.57% |
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 12.65% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 4.94% | 30.14% | -5.97% | 9.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0Z.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, IS0Z.DE and IUSQ.DE have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0Z.DE
IUSQ.DE
IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS0Z.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.43 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 4.08 | -3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 16.69 | -16.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS0Z.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 2.31 | -2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.88 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.82 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.76 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.02%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0Z.DE and IUSQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0Z.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -33.60% | +12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | -6.48% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.11% | -21.25% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -21.25% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.02% | -33.60% | +12.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.06% | -0.55% | -14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -4.19% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 1.59% | -0.38% |
Volatility
IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) is 1.69%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that IS0Z.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0Z.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 3.03% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | 8.26% | -5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 11.47% | -7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.19% | 13.94% | -7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.66% | 15.02% | -9.36% |
IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IS0Z.DE and IUSQ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IS0Z.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS0Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while IUSQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0Z.DE iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.67% | 2.51% | 2.30% | 1.57% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 0.88% | 0.90% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.06% |
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0Z.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS0Z.DE and IUSQ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
IS0Z.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. IS0Z.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Government AAA-AA Capped Bond, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI).
Find the right allocation for IS0Z.DE and IUSQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer