IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE
IS0E.DE (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) and XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) are both Gold funds - IS0E.DE tracks the S&P Commodity Producers Gold while XGDU.DE tracks the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS0E.DE returned 22.20%/yr vs 19.61%/yr for XGDU.DE. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IS0E.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XGDU.DE.
Performance
IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IS0E.DE having a -1.57% return and XGDU.DE slightly lower at -1.60%.
IS0E.DE
- 1D
- 8.14%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- 6M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 1Y
- 52.55%
- 3Y*
- 42.04%
- 5Y*
- 22.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.98%
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- -11.71%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- 27.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €2.49M | €3.53M | €5.52M | |
| €1.95M | €1.83M | €2.35M |
IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -1.57% | 129.59% | 18.76% | 6.25% | -3.74% | -3.07% | 4.53% |
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | -1.60% | 49.09% | 34.21% | 9.43% | 6.99% | 3.80% | -10.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0E.DE and XGDU.DE is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IS0E.DE and XGDU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0E.DE
XGDU.DE
IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IS0E.DE | XGDU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.15 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 2.18 | +1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0E.DE drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than XGDU.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0E.DE and XGDU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0E.DE | XGDU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -22.57% | -59.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.48% | -22.57% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.48% | -22.57% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.05% | -22.57% | -15.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.10% | -18.60% | -5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.84% | -7.09% | -46.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.46% | 11.92% | +4.54% |
Volatility
IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.56% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) at 7.30%. This indicates that IS0E.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGDU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0E.DE | XGDU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.56% | 7.30% | +7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.02% | 18.60% | +16.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.87% | 33.22% | +12.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.49% | 19.24% | +14.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 18.84% | +13.62% |
IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0E.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XGDU.DE's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0E.DE vs. XGDU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS0E.DE nor XGDU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0E.DE and XGDU.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold, while XGDU.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IS0E.DE and 0.11% for XGDU.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS0E.DE and XGDU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer