IS0E.DE vs. QTUM
IS0E.DE (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IS0E.DE is a Gold fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Gold, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS0E.DE returned 18.25%/yr vs 29.26%/yr for QTUM. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS0E.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
IS0E.DE vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IS0E.DE is traded in EUR, while QTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTUM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0E.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 49.66% return.
IS0E.DE
- 1D
- 5.81%
- 1M
- -13.97%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 36.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 13.31%
- YTD
- 49.66%
- 6M
- 47.88%
- 1Y
- 86.00%
- 3Y*
- 44.75%
- 5Y*
- 29.26%
- 10Y*
- —
IS0E.DE vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -7.03% | 129.59% | 18.76% | 6.25% | -3.74% | -3.07% | 13.51% | 44.07% | 19.02% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 49.66% | 20.43% | 60.48% | 35.67% | -24.39% | 45.30% | 30.34% | 51.33% | -18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0E.DE and QTUM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.08 |
The correlation between IS0E.DE and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0E.DE vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
IS0E.DE
QTUM
IS0E.DE vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IS0E.DE | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.47 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 6.68 | -5.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 21.83 | -17.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IS0E.DE vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0E.DE drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0E.DE and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0E.DE | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -35.88% | -46.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.80% | -12.53% | -20.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.80% | -28.54% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.05% | -28.54% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.30% | -3.91% | -24.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.08% | -7.11% | -46.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.59% | 3.83% | +7.76% |
Volatility
IS0E.DE vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.22% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 13.35%. This indicates that IS0E.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0E.DE | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.22% | 13.35% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.38% | 21.89% | +12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.45% | 27.65% | +14.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.47% | 25.95% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.12% | 26.89% | +5.23% |
IS0E.DE vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0E.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0E.DE vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
IS0E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0E.DE and QTUM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
IS0E.DE is categorized as Gold, while QTUM is Technology Equities. IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IS0E.DE and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for IS0E.DE and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer