PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS04.DE vs. USCR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IS04.DE is traded in EUR, while USCR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USCR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS04.DE achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than USCR.L's 1.33% return.


IS04.DE

1D
0.41%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.81%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
2.27%
3Y*
-4.20%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
-1.74%

USCR.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.15%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.15%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IS04.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.81%-6.95%-2.51%-1.21%-26.01%3.49%-5.76%
USCR.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF
1.33%-5.08%8.94%4.78%-10.58%5.88%-1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IS04.DE and USCR.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.70

The correlation between IS04.DE and USCR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS04.DE
IS04.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IS04.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

USCR.L
USCR.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
USCR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
USCR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS04.DEUSCR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.11

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.98

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

2.87

-2.26

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS04.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the USCR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS04.DE and USCR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS04.DEUSCR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.59

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.15

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.05

-0.15

Drawdowns

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS04.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, which is greater than USCR.L's maximum drawdown of -13.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS04.DE and USCR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS04.DEUSCR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.19%

-13.40%

-33.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-3.96%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.47%

-12.05%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.05%

-13.40%

-26.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.69%

-5.41%

-38.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.89%

-6.11%

-15.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.35%

+2.10%

Volatility

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF (USCR.L) at 1.46%. This indicates that IS04.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS04.DEUSCR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

1.46%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

4.91%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.70%

6.53%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

8.98%

+6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

8.84%

+5.85%

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS04.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than USCR.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS04.DE vs. USCR.L - Dividend Comparison

IS04.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while USCR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS04.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.35%4.38%4.62%3.82%3.04%1.71%1.86%2.49%2.79%2.72%2.56%2.14%
USCR.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. Corporate ESG UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS04.DE and USCR.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS04.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS04.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USCR.L.

IS04.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while USCR.L is Corporate Bonds. IS04.DE tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while USCR.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IS04.DE and 0.15% for USCR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS04.DE and USCR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer