PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS02.DE achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than JPBM.DE's 5.47% return.


IS02.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.85%
YTD
5.97%
6M
6.21%
1Y
13.45%
3Y*
7.94%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*

JPBM.DE

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.61%
YTD
5.47%
6M
5.74%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
5.97%1.10%11.83%6.71%-13.12%5.72%-0.46%
JPBM.DE
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
5.47%0.87%7.74%5.71%-10.77%5.50%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IS02.DE and JPBM.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2020

0.91

The correlation between IS02.DE and JPBM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS02.DE
IS02.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

JPBM.DE
JPBM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
JPBM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS02.DEJPBM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

4.16

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

12.20

+1.15

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the JPBM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS02.DE and JPBM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS02.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum JPBM.DE drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS02.DE and JPBM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS02.DEJPBM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-25.94%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-3.07%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-12.49%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-14.10%

-2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.43%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-9.28%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.05%

-0.04%

Volatility

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) is 1.37%, while JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that IS02.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPBM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS02.DEJPBM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

1.55%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.12%

4.13%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10%

5.93%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.54%

8.49%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.38%

14.89%

-6.51%

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS02.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JPBM.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS02.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS02.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPBM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPBM.DE
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
5.66%6.24%5.67%5.42%5.58%3.96%4.40%4.40%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS02.DE and JPBM.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPBM.DE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPBM.DE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IS02.DE.

IS02.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core, while JPBM.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IS02.DE and 0.39% for JPBM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS02.DE and JPBM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer