IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
IS02.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IS02.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core, while IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS02.DE returned 2.88%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for IUSQ.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS02.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUSQ.DE.
Performance
IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS02.DE achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return.
IS02.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS02.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.97% | 1.10% | 11.83% | 6.71% | -13.12% | 5.72% | 0.08% |
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 12.65% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 9.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS02.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020 | 0.42 |
The correlation between IS02.DE and IUSQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS02.DE
IUSQ.DE
IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS02.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 4.08 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.98 | 16.69 | -7.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS02.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.31 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.88 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.76 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS02.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS02.DE and IUSQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS02.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -33.60% | +17.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -6.48% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | -21.25% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -21.25% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.55% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -4.19% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 1.59% | -0.55% |
Volatility
IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) is 1.19%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that IS02.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS02.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 3.03% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.97% | 8.26% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.94% | 11.47% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.53% | 13.94% | -5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 15.02% | -6.68% |
IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS02.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS02.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS02.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS02.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUSQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IS02.DE.
IS02.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. IS02.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IS02.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS02.DE and IUSQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer