IRVSX vs. GSLIX
IRVSX (Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S) and GSLIX (Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IRVSX returned 11.35%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for GSLIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IRVSX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for GSLIX.
Performance
IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IRVSX having a 19.07% return and GSLIX slightly higher at 19.23%. Over the past 10 years, IRVSX has underperformed GSLIX with an annualized return of 11.35%, while GSLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.
IRVSX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 14.94%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 1Y
- 30.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
GSLIX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- YTD
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVSX Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S | 19.07% | 17.81% | 14.66% | 9.98% | -5.71% | 22.68% | 1.11% | 25.45% | -6.83% | 13.20% |
GSLIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund | 19.23% | 10.86% | 30.73% | 13.19% | -6.26% | 24.00% | 4.22% | 26.09% | -8.64% | 9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRVSX and GSLIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IRVSX and GSLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (3 years) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRVSX vs. GSLIX — Risk / Return Rank
IRVSX
GSLIX
IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S (IRVSX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRVSX | GSLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 3.83 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.42 | 16.15 | +5.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRVSX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, smaller than the maximum GSLIX drawdown of -53.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVSX and GSLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRVSX | GSLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.70% | -53.28% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | -7.18% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -22.42% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.49% | -22.42% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.70% | -36.93% | +1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -7.96% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 1.70% | -0.16% |
Volatility
IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S (IRVSX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRVSX | GSLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 3.17% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 9.93% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 12.32% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 18.74% | -4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 18.99% | -2.20% |
IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRVSX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GSLIX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Dividend Comparison
IRVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than GSLIX's 12.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund | 12.14% | 14.48% | 23.46% | 6.25% | 9.37% | 12.38% | 3.54% | 5.82% | 13.23% | 16.85% | 2.08% | 10.60% |
IRVSX Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S | 3.46% | 27.68% | 3.39% | 1.77% | 1.19% | 1.75% | 3.72% | 5.71% | 6.06% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRVSX and GSLIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRVSX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to GSLIX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVSX dropped -35.70% vs GSLIX's -53.28%.
IRVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRVSX and GSLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer