PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRVSX vs. GSLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S (IRVSX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IRVSX having a 19.07% return and GSLIX slightly higher at 19.23%. Over the past 10 years, IRVSX has underperformed GSLIX with an annualized return of 11.35%, while GSLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.


IRVSX

1D
0.76%
1M
3.71%
6M
14.94%
YTD
19.07%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.35%

GSLIX

1D
0.38%
1M
2.71%
6M
15.08%
YTD
19.23%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRVSX
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S
19.07%17.81%14.66%9.98%-5.71%22.68%1.11%25.45%-6.83%13.20%
GSLIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund
19.23%10.86%30.73%13.19%-6.26%24.00%4.22%26.09%-8.64%9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IRVSX and GSLIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009

0.95

The correlation between IRVSX and GSLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (3 years) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRVSX vs. GSLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRVSX
IRVSX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IRVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IRVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

GSLIX
GSLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GSLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S (IRVSX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRVSXGSLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.40

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.09

3.83

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.42

16.15

+5.28

IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRVSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the GSLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRVSX and GSLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRVSX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, smaller than the maximum GSLIX drawdown of -53.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVSX and GSLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRVSXGSLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-53.28%

+17.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-7.18%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-22.42%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.49%

-22.42%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-36.93%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-7.96%

+4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.70%

-0.16%

Volatility

IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S (IRVSX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRVSXGSLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.17%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

9.93%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

12.32%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

18.74%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

18.99%

-2.20%

IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRVSX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GSLIX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRVSX vs. GSLIX - Dividend Comparison

IRVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than GSLIX's 12.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund
12.14%14.48%23.46%6.25%9.37%12.38%3.54%5.82%13.23%16.85%2.08%10.60%
IRVSX
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S
3.46%27.68%3.39%1.77%1.19%1.75%3.72%5.71%6.06%1.74%2.76%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRVSX and GSLIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRVSX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to GSLIX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVSX dropped -35.70% vs GSLIX's -53.28%.

IRVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRVSX and GSLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer