PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLIX vs. AVERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLIX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLIX achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly higher than AVERX's 11.57% return.


GSLIX

1D
0.55%
1M
5.23%
YTD
17.75%
6M
16.85%
1Y
28.38%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
12.93%

AVERX

1D
-1.17%
1M
-7.97%
YTD
11.57%
6M
9.97%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLIX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GSLIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund
17.75%15.39%
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
11.57%0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLIX and AVERX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLIX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLIX
GSLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GSLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

AVERX
AVERX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
AVERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVERX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AVERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLIX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSLIXAVERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.12

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

0.97

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.45

2.63

+14.82

GSLIX vs. AVERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the AVERX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLIX and AVERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSLIX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLIX drawdown since its inception was -53.28%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -13.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLIX and AVERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLIXAVERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.28%

-13.20%

-40.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-13.20%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.20%

+13.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-5.91%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

4.84%

-3.14%

Volatility

GSLIX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) is 4.51%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that GSLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLIXAVERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

5.22%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

14.63%

-4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

19.54%

-7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

18.92%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

18.92%

+0.15%

GSLIX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSLIX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison

GSLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.30%, more than AVERX's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
0.37%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSLIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund
12.30%14.48%23.46%6.25%9.37%12.38%3.54%5.82%13.23%16.85%2.08%10.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSLIX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVERX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to GSLIX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLIX dropped -53.28% vs AVERX's -13.20%.

GSLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLIX and AVERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer