IRVH vs. SHLD
IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRVH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while SHLD is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Defense Tech Index. IRVH is actively managed, while SHLD is passively managed. Over the past year, IRVH returned -3.05% vs -1.74% for SHLD. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
IRVH vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -7.00% return.
IRVH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -4.34%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- -0.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -22.66%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 1Y
- -1.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRVH vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -4.34% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 3.84% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -7.00% | 74.16% | 35.03% | 12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRVH and SHLD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRVH vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank
IRVH
SHLD
IRVH vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRVH | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.01 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | -0.07 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | -0.17 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRVH vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and SHLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRVH | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -25.40% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.28% | -25.40% | +19.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | -22.77% | +11.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -3.93% | -5.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 10.40% | -7.40% |
Volatility
IRVH vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) is 1.28%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that IRVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRVH | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 8.21% | -6.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.36% | 19.78% | -16.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79% | 25.11% | -20.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.74% | 21.52% | -12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.74% | 21.52% | -12.78% |
IRVH vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IRVH and SHLD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
IRVH vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison
IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than SHLD's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.66% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.71% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRVH and SHLD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHLD has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to IRVH (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVH dropped -14.98% vs SHLD's -25.40%.
On 1-year performance, SHLD leads with -1.74% vs -3.05% for IRVH. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SHLD has performed better with a -1.74% return vs -3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRVH and SHLD have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.71% for SHLD.
IRVH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense.
SHLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRVH and SHLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer