IRVH vs. PBTP
IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. IRVH is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IRVH returned -0.70%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for PBTP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRVH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
IRVH vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 2.13% return.
IRVH
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- -1.82%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- —
IRVH vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -3.32% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 0.83% | -6.69% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 2.13% | 5.98% | 4.72% | 4.53% | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRVH and PBTP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2022 | 0.63 |
The correlation between IRVH and PBTP shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRVH vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
IRVH
PBTP
IRVH vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRVH | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.64 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 6.90 | -7.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 24.29 | -25.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRVH | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 2.98 | -3.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 1.30 | -1.52 |
Drawdowns
IRVH vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRVH | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -5.44% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | -0.66% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.03% | -1.03% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -0.04% | -10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -0.75% | -8.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 0.19% | +2.16% |
Volatility
IRVH vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.38%. This indicates that IRVH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRVH | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 0.38% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 1.03% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96% | 1.54% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 2.85% | +5.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 2.64% | +6.20% |
IRVH vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRVH vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than PBTP's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.56% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 3.10% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRVH and PBTP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRVH has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to PBTP (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVH dropped -14.98% vs PBTP's -5.44%.
On 3-year performance, PBTP leads with 5.18% vs -0.70% for IRVH. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PBTP has performed better with a 5.18% return vs -0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IRVH.
IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 3.10% for PBTP.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IRVH and 0.07% for PBTP.
PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRVH and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer