PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRONX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRONX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRONX achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IRONX has outperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 26.84%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively lower 22.58% annualized return.


IRONX

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
4.78%
1Y
14.96%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
26.84%

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRONX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
5.42%10.57%14.78%10.61%0.26%13.24%5.91%458.33%1.99%3.33%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IRONX and NASDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2010

0.78

The correlation between IRONX and NASDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRONX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRONX
IRONX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IRONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRONX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IRONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRONX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRONX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRONXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.65

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

14.16

-4.55

IRONX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRONX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRONX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRONXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.70

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.89

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

1.00

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.33

+0.24

Drawdowns

IRONX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRONX drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRONX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRONXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.71%

-83.16%

+69.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-11.90%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-22.71%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-35.33%

+23.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.71%

-35.33%

+21.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-34.37%

+32.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.06%

-1.46%

Volatility

IRONX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) is 1.84%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that IRONX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRONXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

4.51%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

12.19%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.14%

16.10%

-7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.45%

23.06%

-13.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.76%

22.68%

+18.08%

IRONX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRONX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRONX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

IRONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than NASDX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
0.06%0.06%0.19%5.17%2.97%13.84%4.16%121.75%8.85%9.93%1.42%0.38%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IRONX and NASDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to IRONX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRONX dropped -13.71% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRONX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer