PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRONX vs. MAIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRONX vs. MAIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRONX achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than MAIPX's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IRONX has outperformed MAIPX with an annualized return of 26.84%, while MAIPX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.


IRONX

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
4.78%
1Y
14.96%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
26.84%

MAIPX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.99%
YTD
5.94%
6M
6.18%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
7.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRONX vs. MAIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
5.42%10.57%14.78%10.61%0.26%13.24%5.91%458.33%1.99%3.33%
MAIPX
MAI Managed Volatility Fund
5.94%10.28%8.64%10.58%-3.59%12.81%4.39%16.13%-2.76%8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IRONX and MAIPX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2010

0.77

The correlation between IRONX and MAIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRONX vs. MAIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRONX
IRONX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IRONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRONX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IRONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRONX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MAIPX
MAIPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MAIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MAIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRONX vs. MAIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRONXMAIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.71

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

4.60

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

27.17

-17.55

IRONX vs. MAIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRONX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the MAIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRONX and MAIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRONXMAIPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

3.03

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.86

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.67

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.68

-0.10

Drawdowns

IRONX vs. MAIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRONX drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, smaller than the maximum MAIPX drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRONX and MAIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRONXMAIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.71%

-25.69%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-3.10%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-11.77%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-11.77%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.71%

-25.69%

+11.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.11%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-1.42%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

0.52%

+1.08%

Volatility

IRONX vs. MAIPX - Volatility Comparison

Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX) at 0.99%. This indicates that IRONX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRONXMAIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

0.99%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

3.94%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.14%

4.70%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.45%

8.85%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.76%

10.97%

+29.79%

IRONX vs. MAIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRONX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MAIPX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRONX vs. MAIPX - Dividend Comparison

IRONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than MAIPX's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
0.06%0.06%0.19%5.17%2.97%13.84%4.16%121.75%8.85%9.93%1.42%0.38%
MAIPX
MAI Managed Volatility Fund
1.13%1.33%2.20%4.59%2.26%0.00%0.32%1.74%2.89%2.12%0.80%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRONX and MAIPX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRONX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to MAIPX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRONX dropped -13.71% vs MAIPX's -25.69%.

MAIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRONX and MAIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer