PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRON vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IRON vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Disc Medicine Inc. (IRON) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IRON vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IRON
Disc Medicine Inc.
-19.48%25.25%2.26%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
-22.56%-6.56%99.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRON achieves a -19.48% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -22.56% return.


IRON

1D
5.20%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
-19.48%
6M
-3.24%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
44.50%
5Y*
-13.57%
10Y*

FBTC

1D
1.97%
1M
3.29%
YTD
-22.56%
6M
-40.86%
1Y
-17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRON vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRON
IRON Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IRON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRON Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRON Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IRON Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRON Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRON vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Disc Medicine Inc. (IRON) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRONFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

-0.40

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

-0.29

+1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.97

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

-0.39

+0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.48

-0.84

+2.32

IRON vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRON Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRON and FBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRONFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

-0.40

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.35

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between IRON and FBTC is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IRON vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither IRON nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IRON vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRON drawdown since its inception was -93.22%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRON and FBTC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IRONFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.22%

-49.33%

-43.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.55%

-49.33%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.48%

-46.06%

-18.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.62%

-14.12%

-52.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.93%

23.05%

-8.12%

Volatility

IRON vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

Disc Medicine Inc. (IRON) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) at 12.97%. This indicates that IRON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IRONFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.62%

12.97%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.93%

36.77%

+11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.21%

45.30%

+15.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.60%

51.21%

+21.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.40%

51.21%

+19.19%