IRON vs. AMLX
IRON (Disc Medicine Inc.) and AMLX (Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 3 years, IRON returned 17.02%/yr vs -7.32%/yr for AMLX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IRON vs. AMLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRON achieves a -3.55% return, which is significantly lower than AMLX's 47.10% return.
IRON
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- 12.65%
- 6M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- —
AMLX
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- 21.80%
- 6M
- 45.54%
- YTD
- 47.10%
- 1Y
- 131.38%
- 3Y*
- -7.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRON vs. AMLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON Disc Medicine Inc. | -3.55% | 25.25% | 9.76% | 190.40% | -23.79% |
AMLX Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 47.10% | 219.58% | -74.32% | -60.16% | 75.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRON and AMLX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2022 | 0.24 |
The correlation between IRON and AMLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IRON:
$2.93B
AMLX:
$1.48B
IRON:
-$6.65
AMLX:
-$1.51
IRON:
4.28
AMLX:
7.19
IRON:
$0.00
AMLX:
$0.00
IRON:
-$265.00K
AMLX:
-$20.10M
IRON:
-$243.47M
AMLX:
-$150.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRON vs. AMLX — Risk / Return Rank
IRON
AMLX
IRON vs. AMLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Disc Medicine Inc. (IRON) and Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRON | AMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.34 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 4.62 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 9.87 | -8.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRON vs. AMLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRON drawdown since its inception was -93.22%, roughly equal to the maximum AMLX drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRON and AMLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRON | AMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.22% | -96.04% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.55% | -30.61% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.79% | -93.09% | +28.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.45% | -56.58% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.33% | -59.36% | -6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.61% | 14.29% | +5.32% |
Volatility
IRON vs. AMLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Disc Medicine Inc. (IRON) is 9.52%, while Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that IRON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRON | AMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 11.89% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.57% | 43.27% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.77% | 61.24% | -8.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.06% | 91.05% | -21.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.16% | 91.05% | -21.89% |
Dividends
IRON vs. AMLX - Dividend Comparison
Neither IRON nor AMLX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
IRON vs. AMLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Disc Medicine Inc. and Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IRON and AMLX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMLX has higher volatility (11.89%) compared to IRON (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRON dropped -93.22% vs AMLX's -96.04%.
AMLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRON and AMLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer