IRM vs. LLY
IRM (Iron Mountain Incorporated) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) are both stocks. IRM operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate), while LLY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, IRM returned 19.08%/yr vs 33.45%/yr for LLY. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IRM vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRM achieves a 54.64% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IRM has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 19.08%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.45% annualized return.
IRM
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 54.64%
- 6M
- 55.51%
- 1Y
- 29.64%
- 3Y*
- 35.74%
- 5Y*
- 27.45%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
LLY
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 12.75%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 39.26%
- 3Y*
- 37.45%
- 5Y*
- 39.59%
- 10Y*
- 33.45%
IRM vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 54.64% | -18.24% | 54.48% | 46.52% | -0.08% | 87.74% | 0.98% | 5.87% | -7.97% | 23.56% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 5.78% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRM and LLY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1996 | 0.21 |
The correlation between IRM and LLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IRM:
$38.02B
LLY:
$1.02T
IRM:
$0.91
LLY:
$28.14
IRM:
139.08
LLY:
40.26
IRM:
5.23
LLY:
14.08
IRM:
$7.25B
LLY:
$72.25B
IRM:
$2.94B
LLY:
$59.75B
IRM:
$2.40B
LLY:
$32.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRM vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
IRM
LLY
IRM vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 1.72 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 4.28 | -1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRM vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRM drawdown since its inception was -55.71%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRM and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.71% | -68.24% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.15% | -23.64% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.03% | -34.48% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.03% | -34.48% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.03% | -34.48% | -4.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -2.41% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.16% | -19.21% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 9.49% | +0.98% |
Volatility
IRM vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is 7.91%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that IRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.91% | 9.27% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.13% | 27.16% | -3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.04% | 38.01% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 32.46% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.64% | 30.19% | -0.55% |
Dividends
IRM vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than LLY's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 2.59% | 3.88% | 2.60% | 3.63% | 4.96% | 4.73% | 8.39% | 7.69% | 7.32% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.57% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
Financials
IRM vs. LLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Iron Mountain Incorporated and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IRM vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison
IRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
IRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 395.23M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.
LLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.
IRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 143.67M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
LLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IRM and LLY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLY has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to IRM (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRM dropped -55.71% vs LLY's -68.24%.
LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRM and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer