PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRGJX vs. XHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRGJX vs. XHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRGJX) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRGJX achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than XHR's 30.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IRGJX has outperformed XHR with an annualized return of 12.14%, while XHR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.78% annualized return.


IRGJX

1D
-1.03%
1M
3.23%
YTD
3.66%
6M
2.09%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
12.14%

XHR

1D
2.98%
1M
9.32%
YTD
30.60%
6M
38.54%
1Y
59.61%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
4.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRGJX vs. XHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRGJX
Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio
3.66%8.53%21.54%25.34%-26.82%12.16%34.60%34.39%-5.13%24.67%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
30.60%-0.71%12.72%6.71%-26.13%19.14%-27.75%32.33%-15.96%17.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IRGJX and XHR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015

0.47

The correlation between IRGJX and XHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRGJX vs. XHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRGJX
IRGJX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IRGJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRGJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRGJX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IRGJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRGJX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XHR
XHR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRGJX vs. XHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRGJX) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRGJXXHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.69

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.19

10.92

-9.74

IRGJX vs. XHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRGJX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the XHR Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRGJX and XHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRGJXXHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

2.17

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.03

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.11

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.07

+0.59

Drawdowns

IRGJX vs. XHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRGJX drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum XHR drawdown of -71.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRGJX and XHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRGJXXHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-71.02%

+32.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.85%

-16.23%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.37%

-42.47%

+17.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.65%

-51.28%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.65%

-71.02%

+32.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-8.80%

+6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-26.13%

+19.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

5.47%

-0.42%

Volatility

IRGJX vs. XHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRGJX) is 4.27%, while Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that IRGJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRGJXXHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

7.60%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

20.01%

-7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

27.65%

-10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

34.57%

-11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

42.46%

-20.37%

Dividends

IRGJX vs. XHR - Dividend Comparison

IRGJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, more than XHR's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRGJX
Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio
13.52%14.29%0.35%0.42%12.03%3.55%5.50%10.03%13.76%0.83%0.96%0.91%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
3.06%3.96%3.23%2.94%1.52%0.00%1.81%5.09%6.40%5.09%5.66%5.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRGJX and XHR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XHR has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to IRGJX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRGJX dropped -38.65% vs XHR's -71.02%.

XHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRGJX and XHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer