IRE vs. XTJL
IRE (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IREN ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IRE charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
IRE vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRE achieves a -63.30% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 6.32% return.
IRE
- 1D
- -7.43%
- 1M
- -26.85%
- 6M
- -79.34%
- YTD
- -63.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $104.51M | $97.02M | $161.63M | |
| $26.11K | $26.81K | $267.40K |
IRE vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IRE Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IREN ETF | -63.30% | -67.36% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.32% | 2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRE and XTJL is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRE vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
IRE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTJL
IRE vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IREN ETF (IRE) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRE | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRE vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRE drawdown since its inception was -95.22%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRE and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRE | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.22% | -23.24% | -71.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.93% | -0.09% | -92.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.92% | -3.92% | -69.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.93% | — |
Volatility
IRE vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRE | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 226.19% | 7.79% | +218.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 226.19% | 15.11% | +211.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 226.19% | 15.03% | +211.16% |
IRE vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRE has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRE vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither IRE nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IRE and XTJL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for IRE.
IRE and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for IRE and 0.79% for XTJL.
Find the right allocation for IRE and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer