PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRBO vs. RBTX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IRBO is traded in USD, while RBTX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RBTX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 54.55% return, which is significantly higher than RBTX.L's 28.80% return.


IRBO

1D
-6.30%
1M
8.26%
YTD
54.55%
6M
54.11%
1Y
93.11%
3Y*
33.04%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*

RBTX.L

1D
-4.06%
1M
2.44%
YTD
28.80%
6M
28.77%
1Y
46.05%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
54.55%29.97%8.02%36.37%-37.89%6.32%48.85%34.47%-13.76%
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
28.80%17.41%5.72%39.02%-34.40%21.16%39.22%37.84%-17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IRBO and RBTX.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.69

The correlation between IRBO and RBTX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IRBO
RBTX.L

Technology

83.8%
73.1%

Communication Services

5.5%
0.1%

Industrials

4.7%
23.7%

Utilities

3.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%
2.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Technology

IRBO
83.8%
RBTX.L
73.1%

Communication Services

IRBO
5.5%
RBTX.L
0.1%

Industrials

IRBO
4.7%
RBTX.L
23.7%

Utilities

IRBO
3.2%
RBTX.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IRBO
2.9%
RBTX.L
0.5%

Real Estate

IRBO
1.2%
RBTX.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IRBO
0.0%
RBTX.L

-

Healthcare

IRBO
0.0%
RBTX.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

IRBO

-

RBTX.L
0.0%

Energy

IRBO

-

RBTX.L

-

Financial Services

IRBO

-

RBTX.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRBO vs. RBTX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBO
IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRBORBTX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

2.98

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

10.09

+6.19

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRBO and RBTX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than RBTX.L's maximum drawdown of -44.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and RBTX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRBORBTX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

-44.44%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

-15.36%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

-24.96%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

-44.44%

-6.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.78%

-4.06%

-3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.76%

-12.09%

-7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

4.55%

+1.19%

Volatility

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) has a higher volatility of 19.32% compared to iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) at 9.39%. This indicates that IRBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBTX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRBORBTX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.32%

9.39%

+9.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.00%

19.67%

+10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.22%

23.80%

+10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.57%

27.22%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.30%

25.72%

+2.58%

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than RBTX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRBO vs. RBTX.L - Dividend Comparison

IRBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while RBTX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
0.06%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRBO and RBTX.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBTX.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBTX.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IRBO.

IRBO tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index, while RBTX.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.40% for RBTX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRBO and RBTX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer