IRBO vs. PBOT
IRBO (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Robotics funds. IRBO is passively managed, while PBOT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IRBO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.
Performance
IRBO vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 45.29% return, which is significantly higher than PBOT's 30.94% return.
IRBO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- 6M
- 37.55%
- YTD
- 45.29%
- 1Y
- 69.58%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- —
PBOT
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 26.00%
- YTD
- 30.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRBO vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 45.29% | -1.03% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 30.94% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRBO and PBOT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRBO vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank
IRBO
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IRBO vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRBO | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRBO vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and PBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRBO | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.50% | -15.78% | -38.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.31% | -2.75% | -10.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.69% | -4.28% | -15.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.25% | — | — |
Volatility
IRBO vs. PBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRBO | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.31% | 27.00% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 27.00% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.40% | 27.00% | +1.40% |
IRBO vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRBO vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison
IRBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than PBOT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.88% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 0.53% | 0.69% | 0.34% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRBO and PBOT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PBOT.
PBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.06% for IRBO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.70% for PBOT.
Find the right allocation for IRBO and PBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer