PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRBO vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRBO vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 66.09% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return.


IRBO

1D
-0.90%
1M
26.10%
YTD
66.09%
6M
63.47%
1Y
112.42%
3Y*
36.54%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRBO vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IRBO
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF
66.09%29.97%8.02%36.37%-37.89%6.32%48.85%34.47%-14.31%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IRBO and IVV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018

0.82

The correlation between IRBO and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

IRBO vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IRBO
IVV

Technology

83.8%
35.6%

Communication Services

5.5%
11.2%

Industrials

4.7%
8.3%

Utilities

3.2%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
10.1%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Technology

IRBO
83.8%
IVV
35.6%

Communication Services

IRBO
5.5%
IVV
11.2%

Industrials

IRBO
4.7%
IVV
8.3%

Utilities

IRBO
3.2%
IVV
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IRBO
2.9%
IVV
10.1%

Real Estate

IRBO
1.2%
IVV
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

IRBO
0.0%
IVV
4.9%

Healthcare

IRBO
0.0%
IVV
8.5%

Basic Materials

IRBO

-

IVV
1.8%

Energy

IRBO

-

IVV
3.5%

Financial Services

IRBO

-

IVV
11.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRBO vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBO
IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBO vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRBOIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.43

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.01

3.17

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.88

14.71

+6.17

IRBO vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRBO Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is higher than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRBO and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRBOIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78

2.39

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.83

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.45

+0.18

Drawdowns

IRBO vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, roughly equal to the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRBOIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

-55.25%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

-8.89%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

-18.75%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

-24.53%

-26.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.76%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.85%

-10.78%

-9.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.40%

1.91%

+3.49%

Volatility

IRBO vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that IRBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRBOIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.01%

2.87%

+9.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.12%

8.90%

+16.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.94%

11.80%

+18.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.58%

16.88%

+11.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.75%

18.05%

+9.70%

IRBO vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRBO vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

IRBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRBO
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRBO and IVV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRBO has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBO dropped -54.50% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 5-year performance, IRBO leads with 14.13% vs 13.88% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IRBO has performed better with a 14.13% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IRBO.

IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for IRBO.

IRBO is categorized as Robotics, while IVV is S&P 500. IRBO tracks NYSE FactSet Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.03% for IVV.

IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRBO and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer