IR vs. MTSI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI).

Performance

IR vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IR vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc	1.01%	-12.34%	17.06%	48.21%	-15.41%	35.85%	24.21%	92.80%	-39.73%	60.81%
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.	33.91%	31.85%	39.76%	47.59%	-19.57%	42.26%	106.92%	83.32%	-55.41%	-32.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IR : $31.66B MTSI : $17.60B
EPS IR : $1.46 MTSI : $2.14
PE Ratio IR : 54.89 MTSI : 106.95
PEG Ratio IR : 13.05 MTSI : 0.16
PS Ratio IR : 4.17 MTSI : 16.98
PB Ratio IR : 3.14 MTSI : 13.00
Total Revenue (TTM) IR : $7.65B MTSI : $1.02B
Gross Profit (TTM) IR : $2.95B MTSI : $555.94M
EBITDA (TTM) IR : $1.69B MTSI : $242.28M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IR achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than MTSI's 33.91% return.

IR

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -14.85%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: -4.15%
• 1Y: -0.66%
• 3Y*: 11.31%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: —

MTSI

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -11.29%
• YTD: 33.91%
• 6M: 81.23%
• 1Y: 126.35%
• 3Y*: 47.94%
• 5Y*: 31.40%
• 10Y*: 17.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IR vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IR

IR Risk / Return Rank: 37
IR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
IR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

MTSI

MTSI Risk / Return Rank: 93
MTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IR vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IR	MTSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	2.45	-2.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	2.98	-2.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.41	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.00	6.51	-6.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.01	17.05	-17.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IR vs. MTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IR Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the MTSI Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IR and MTSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IR	MTSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02	2.45	-2.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.74	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.38	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between IR and MTSI is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IR vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison

IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while MTSI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc	0.10%	0.10%	0.09%	0.10%	0.15%	0.03%	0.00%	5.78%
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IR vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IR drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum MTSI drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IR and MTSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IR	MTSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-80.78%	+30.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.08%	-19.74%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.62%	-44.86%	+8.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.97%	-11.29%	-12.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.52%	-26.53%	+14.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.54%	7.53%	+2.01%

Volatility

IR vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) is 10.01%, while MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) has a volatility of 19.79%. This indicates that IR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IR	MTSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.01%	19.79%	-9.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.36%	38.24%	-15.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.76%	51.98%	-17.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.44%	42.67%	-13.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.27%	51.92%	-17.65%

Financials

IR vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ingersoll-Rand Plc and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a gross profit of 503.20M and revenue of 2.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

MTSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 151.78M and revenue of 271.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

IR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported an operating income of 663.60M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

MTSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 43.30M and revenue of 271.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

IR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a net income of 266.10M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.

MTSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 48.77M and revenue of 271.61M, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.