IR vs. JPM
IR (Ingersoll-Rand Plc) and JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) are both stocks. IR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while JPM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, IR returned 10.64%/yr vs 20.23%/yr for JPM. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IR vs. JPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IR achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than JPM's 6.66% return.
IR
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- -6.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.53%
JPM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.23%
- 10Y*
- 21.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.35%
IR vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc | 1.26% | -12.34% | 17.06% | 48.21% | -15.41% | 35.85% | 24.21% | 92.80% | -39.73% | 59.67% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 6.66% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 30.63% | -12.64% | 27.75% | -5.53% | 47.26% | -6.62% | 24.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between IR and JPM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017 | 0.50 |
The correlation between IR and JPM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
IR:
$31.38B
JPM:
$908.01B
IR:
$2.21
JPM:
$23.29
IR:
36.26
JPM:
14.55
IR:
8.62
JPM:
1.61
IR:
2.74
JPM:
3.18
IR:
$7.78B
JPM:
$297.63B
IR:
$2.98B
JPM:
$186.33B
IR:
$1.55B
JPM:
$90.84B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IR vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank
IR
JPM
IR vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IR | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.16 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.21 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 2.85 | -3.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IR vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IR drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IR and JPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IR | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -76.16% | +25.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.56% | -15.47% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.62% | -24.42% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.62% | -38.77% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.78% | -2.32% | -21.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -17.58% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 6.53% | +8.01% |
Volatility
IR vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison
Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) has a higher volatility of 10.80% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.42%. This indicates that IR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IR | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.80% | 6.42% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.83% | 16.66% | +10.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.79% | 22.17% | +12.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.26% | 24.41% | +5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 27.31% | +7.09% |
Dividends
IR vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison
IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than JPM's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 5.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.77% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
Financials
IR vs. JPM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingersoll-Rand Plc and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IR vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison
IR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a gross profit of 792.40M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
JPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 54.83B and revenue of 82.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.5%.
IR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported an operating income of 289.70M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.7%.
JPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 27.52B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%.
IR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a net income of 192.10M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
JPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 21.16B and revenue of 82.46B, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IR and JPM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IR has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to JPM (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IR dropped -50.27% vs JPM's -76.16%.
JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IR and JPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer