IQSU vs. ILCG
IQSU (IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IQSU tracks the IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index while ILCG tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQSU returned 12.19%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for ILCG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
IQSU vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly higher than ILCG's 9.21% return.
IQSU
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 11.76%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 26.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 22.02%
- 3Y*
- 23.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.10%
IQSU vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 11.76% | 14.44% | 16.64% | 32.96% | -22.10% | 30.53% | 28.24% | 0.98% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 9.21% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -31.75% | 24.33% | 38.56% | 1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSU and ILCG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IQSU and ILCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IQSU vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQSU
ILCG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
IQSU
ILCG
Consumer Cyclical
IQSU
ILCG
Communication Services
IQSU
ILCG
Financial Services
IQSU
ILCG
Industrials
IQSU
ILCG
Healthcare
IQSU
ILCG
Consumer Defensive
IQSU
ILCG
Basic Materials
IQSU
ILCG
Real Estate
IQSU
ILCG
Utilities
IQSU
ILCG
Energy
IQSU
ILCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSU vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
IQSU
ILCG
IQSU vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQSU | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.41 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.76 | 4.86 | +4.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQSU vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSU | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -52.98% | +21.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -15.65% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.96% | -23.10% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.76% | -35.38% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -5.58% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -8.21% | +2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 4.54% | -1.77% |
Volatility
IQSU vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) is 5.59%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that IQSU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSU | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 7.83% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 14.51% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 17.70% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 22.22% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 21.63% | -0.94% |
IQSU vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IQSU vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.15% | 1.47% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSU and ILCG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILCG has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to IQSU (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs ILCG's -52.98%.
On 5-year performance, ILCG leads with 12.71% vs 12.19% for IQSU. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IQSU has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 12.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IQSU.
IQSU has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.
IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.04% for ILCG.
IQSU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQSU and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer