IQSU vs. ACSI
IQSU (IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF) and ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IQSU tracks the IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index while ACSI tracks the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQSU returned 12.84%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for ACSI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for ACSI.
Performance
IQSU vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than ACSI's 9.66% return.
IQSU
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- —
IQSU vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 13.06% | 14.44% | 16.64% | 32.96% | -22.10% | 30.53% | 28.24% | 1.24% |
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 9.66% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 21.06% | -20.93% | 23.33% | 22.93% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSU and ACSI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IQSU and ACSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IQSU vs. ACSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQSU
ACSI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Utilities
Technology
IQSU
ACSI
Communication Services
IQSU
ACSI
Consumer Cyclical
IQSU
ACSI
Financial Services
IQSU
ACSI
Industrials
IQSU
ACSI
Healthcare
IQSU
ACSI
Consumer Defensive
IQSU
ACSI
Real Estate
IQSU
ACSI
-
Basic Materials
IQSU
ACSI
-
Energy
IQSU
ACSI
Utilities
IQSU
ACSI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSU vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank
IQSU
ACSI
IQSU vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQSU | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 1.63 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | 2.31 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.42 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.74 | 9.45 | +1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQSU | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.63 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.55 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.75 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IQSU vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and ACSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSU | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -34.49% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -7.76% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.96% | -15.27% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.76% | -24.86% | -1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -2.38% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -5.39% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 1.98% | +0.76% |
Volatility
IQSU vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) is 3.64%, while American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that IQSU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSU | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 4.16% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 8.88% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 11.56% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 16.66% | +1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 17.43% | +3.25% |
IQSU vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQSU vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison
IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than ACSI's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% |
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.15% | 1.47% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSU and ACSI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACSI has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to IQSU (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs ACSI's -34.49%.
On 5-year performance, IQSU leads with 12.84% vs 9.12% for ACSI. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IQSU has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.
IQSU has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.83% for ACSI.
IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Exponential ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.66% for ACSI.
IQSU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQSU and ACSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer