PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQSS.L is traded in GBp, while XWEV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XWEV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSS.L achieves a 15.54% return, which is significantly lower than XWEV.L's 17.92% return.


IQSS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
3.26%
YTD
15.54%
6M
15.72%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XWEV.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.21%
YTD
17.92%
6M
18.23%
1Y
44.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IQSS.L
Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
15.54%14.30%6.63%
XWEV.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Value ESG UCITS ETF 1C
17.92%28.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSS.L and XWEV.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024

0.82

The correlation between IQSS.L and XWEV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSS.L
IQSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XWEV.L
XWEV.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XWEV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWEV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWEV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XWEV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWEV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQSS.LXWEV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.59

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.03

5.26

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.00

19.68

+1.32

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the XWEV.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSS.L and XWEV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.91%, which is greater than XWEV.L's maximum drawdown of -15.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSS.L and XWEV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSS.LXWEV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-15.50%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-8.51%

+1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-1.89%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-1.90%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.28%

-0.65%

Volatility

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) is 3.41%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEV.L) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that IQSS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XWEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSS.LXWEV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

4.88%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

11.86%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

14.33%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

13.99%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.14%

13.99%

+0.15%

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSS.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XWEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSS.L vs. XWEV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQSS.L nor XWEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSS.L and XWEV.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XWEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IQSS.L.

IQSS.L is categorized as ESG, while XWEV.L is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IQSS.L and 0.25% for XWEV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSS.L and XWEV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer