PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Invesco MSCI USA Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESGS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSS.L achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly higher than ESGS.L's 10.00% return.


IQSS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.03%
6M
12.19%
YTD
15.17%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESGS.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
-1.50%
6M
8.24%
YTD
10.00%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IQSS.L and ESGS.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024

0.91

The correlation between IQSS.L and ESGS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSS.L
IQSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGS.L
ESGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ESGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Invesco MSCI USA Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQSS.LESGS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

2.42

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.51

8.32

+9.19

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the ESGS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSS.L and ESGS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.91%, smaller than the maximum ESGS.L drawdown of -29.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSS.L and ESGS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSS.LESGS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-29.04%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-8.16%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.89%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-6.91%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.38%

-0.72%

Volatility

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Invesco MSCI USA Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESGS.L) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSS.LESGS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

3.66%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

8.60%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

11.59%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

20.35%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

21.41%

-7.30%

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSS.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGS.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSS.L vs. ESGS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQSS.L nor ESGS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSS.L and ESGS.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESGS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IQSS.L.

IQSS.L is categorized as ESG, while ESGS.L is US Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IQSS.L and 0.09% for ESGS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSS.L and ESGS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer