PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSM vs. BMVP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSM vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSM achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than BMVP's 5.85% return.


IQSM

1D
0.11%
1M
4.36%
YTD
11.77%
6M
12.17%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10Y*

BMVP

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.31%
YTD
5.85%
6M
6.04%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSM vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IQSM
IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
11.77%7.97%9.15%15.82%2.29%
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
5.85%6.15%17.46%19.03%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSM and BMVP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022

0.82

The correlation between IQSM and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQSM vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSM
BMVP

Industrials

23.1%
16.8%

Technology

15.5%
16.4%

Healthcare

14.2%
9.7%

Financial Services

12.4%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.6%

Real Estate

10.0%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
5.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.6%

Energy

2.6%
5.2%

Communication Services

2.6%
7.6%

Utilities

0.6%
5.1%

Industrials

IQSM
23.1%
BMVP
16.8%

Technology

IQSM
15.5%
BMVP
16.4%

Healthcare

IQSM
14.2%
BMVP
9.7%

Financial Services

IQSM
12.4%
BMVP
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IQSM
10.2%
BMVP
10.6%

Real Estate

IQSM
10.0%
BMVP
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

IQSM
4.6%
BMVP
5.1%

Basic Materials

IQSM
4.1%
BMVP
1.6%

Energy

IQSM
2.6%
BMVP
5.2%

Communication Services

IQSM
2.6%
BMVP
7.6%

Utilities

IQSM
0.6%
BMVP
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSM vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSM
IQSM Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IQSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BMVP
BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSM vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSMBMVPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.15

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.32

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

4.06

+5.36

IQSM vs. BMVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the BMVP Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSM and BMVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSMBMVPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

0.88

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.11

+0.63

Drawdowns

IQSM vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSM drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSM and BMVP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSMBMVPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.66%

-78.13%

+54.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-6.45%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-15.12%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.37%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-36.21%

+31.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.10%

+0.32%

Volatility

IQSM vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) at 2.14%. This indicates that IQSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSMBMVPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

2.14%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

7.19%

+3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

9.75%

+5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

16.07%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

18.81%

-0.92%

IQSM vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSM vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison

IQSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BMVP's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
1.68%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
IQSM
IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.06%1.18%1.22%1.11%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSM and BMVP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQSM has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to BMVP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSM dropped -23.66% vs BMVP's -78.13%.

On 3-year performance, IQSM leads with 13.84% vs 13.71% for BMVP. On fees, IQSM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IQSM has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 13.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BMVP.

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.06% for IQSM.

IQSM tracks IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSM and 0.29% for BMVP.

IQSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSM and BMVP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer