IQSM vs. BMVP
IQSM (IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - IQSM tracks the IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net while BMVP tracks the Bloomberg MVP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQSM returned 13.84%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for BMVP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.
Performance
IQSM vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSM achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than BMVP's 5.85% return.
IQSM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMVP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
IQSM vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 11.77% | 7.97% | 9.15% | 15.82% | 2.29% |
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 5.85% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSM and BMVP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IQSM and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IQSM vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQSM
BMVP
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
IQSM
BMVP
Technology
IQSM
BMVP
Healthcare
IQSM
BMVP
Financial Services
IQSM
BMVP
Consumer Cyclical
IQSM
BMVP
Real Estate
IQSM
BMVP
Consumer Defensive
IQSM
BMVP
Basic Materials
IQSM
BMVP
Energy
IQSM
BMVP
Communication Services
IQSM
BMVP
Utilities
IQSM
BMVP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSM vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank
IQSM
BMVP
IQSM vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQSM | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 1.32 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.43 | 4.06 | +5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQSM | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.88 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.11 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
IQSM vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSM drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSM and BMVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSM | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.66% | -78.13% | +54.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -6.45% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -15.12% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.37% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -36.21% | +31.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.10% | +0.32% |
Volatility
IQSM vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison
IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) at 2.14%. This indicates that IQSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSM | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 2.14% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 7.19% | +3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 9.75% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 16.07% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 18.81% | -0.92% |
IQSM vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQSM vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison
IQSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BMVP's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSM and BMVP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQSM has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to BMVP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSM dropped -23.66% vs BMVP's -78.13%.
On 3-year performance, IQSM leads with 13.84% vs 13.71% for BMVP. On fees, IQSM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IQSM has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 13.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQSM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BMVP.
BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.06% for IQSM.
IQSM tracks IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSM and 0.29% for BMVP.
IQSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQSM and BMVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer