IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L
IQSE.DE (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF EUR PfHedged Acc) and AMDI.L (IncomeShares AMD Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - IQSE.DE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Invesco, while AMDI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IQSE.DE returned 27.65% vs 104.05% for AMDI.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQSE.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AMDI.L.
Performance
IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IQSE.DE is traded in EUR, while AMDI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMDI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSE.DE achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly lower than AMDI.L's 86.60% return.
IQSE.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- YTD
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.23%
AMDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- 6M
- 76.50%
- YTD
- 86.60%
- 1Y
- 104.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19,697.94%
IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IQSE.DE Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF EUR PfHedged Acc | 14.06% | 12.27% |
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 86.60% | 12,661.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSE.DE and AMDI.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IQSE.DE
AMDI.L
IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF EUR PfHedged Acc (IQSE.DE) and IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQSE.DE | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.31 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.18 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.27 | 3.71 | +10.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, smaller than the maximum AMDI.L drawdown of -47.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSE.DE and AMDI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSE.DE | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -47.77% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.11% | -47.77% | +39.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -17.04% | +15.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -21.33% | +16.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 28.05% | -26.12% |
Volatility
IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF EUR PfHedged Acc (IQSE.DE) is 3.50%, while IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a volatility of 25.65%. This indicates that IQSE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSE.DE | AMDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 25.65% | -22.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 46.79% | -36.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 75.67% | -62.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 9,752.55% | -9,736.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 9,752.55% | -9,735.00% |
IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSE.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQSE.DE vs. AMDI.L - Dividend Comparison
IQSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 52.97% | 8.85% |
IQSE.DE Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF EUR PfHedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSE.DE and AMDI.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSE.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AMDI.L.
IQSE.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while AMDI.L is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQSE.DE and 0.55% for AMDI.L.
Find the right allocation for IQSE.DE and AMDI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer