IQSA.L vs. MWRD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IQSA.L (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both Global Equities funds. IQSA.L is actively managed, while MWRD.L is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQSA.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.

Performance

IQSA.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IQSA.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

IQSA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.34%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 6M: 16.56%
• 1Y: 30.89%
• 3Y*: 25.43%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: —

MWRD.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSA.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IQSA.L Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc	14.07%	22.67%	22.82%	24.38%	-14.01%	24.96%	10.21%	12.52%
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World	0.00%	0.00%	-1.64%	23.69%	-18.69%	22.97%	15.27%	13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSA.L and MWRD.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2019	0.68

The correlation between IQSA.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQSA.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQSA.L	MWRD.L
Technology	33.0%	24.7%
Financial Services	21.2%	14.7%
Industrials	13.3%	10.6%
Communication Services	11.3%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	10.5%
Healthcare	7.3%	12.4%
Basic Materials	3.7%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	6.7%
Utilities	0.3%	2.4%
Real Estate	0.3%	2.4%
Energy	-	4.4%

Return for Risk

IQSA.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSA.L

IQSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
IQSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IQSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IQSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IQSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
IQSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSA.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQSA.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.35	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQSA.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IQSA.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.91%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IQSA.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.14%	—	—

IQSA.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSA.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQSA.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQSA.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQSA.L and MWRD.L in my portfolio?

IQSA.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IQSA.L or MWRD.L?

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQSA.L or MWRD.L?

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQSA.L.

What is the main difference between IQSA.L and MWRD.L?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQSA.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.