PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQX.DE achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than SXRV.DE's 20.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQX.DE has underperformed SXRV.DE with an annualized return of 6.29%, while SXRV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.24% annualized return.


IQQX.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
13.33%
6M
13.65%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
6.29%

SXRV.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
7.99%
YTD
20.57%
6M
18.73%
1Y
37.06%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
21.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
13.33%14.78%12.48%8.98%2.81%11.77%-18.85%16.80%-11.26%2.03%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.57%6.98%33.55%51.19%-30.05%39.34%34.48%42.90%3.03%15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQX.DE and SXRV.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010

0.54

The correlation between IQQX.DE and SXRV.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQX.DE
IQQX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRV.DE
SXRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQX.DESXRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.42

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.55

3.75

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.94

11.16

+9.78

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQX.DE and SXRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQX.DESXRV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.40

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.93

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

1.07

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.91

-0.69

Drawdowns

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQX.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.45%, which is greater than SXRV.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQX.DE and SXRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQX.DESXRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.45%

-32.80%

-36.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-10.03%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.28%

-26.69%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-31.33%

+11.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.78%

-31.33%

-11.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.83%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-6.56%

-7.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

3.38%

-1.74%

Volatility

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) is 2.93%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that IQQX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQX.DESXRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

4.26%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

10.98%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.06%

15.67%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.01%

19.84%

-6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

19.65%

-3.90%

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQX.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while SXRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
3.12%3.64%4.84%5.36%6.66%4.62%3.16%4.85%5.09%4.16%4.03%4.88%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQX.DE and SXRV.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRV.DE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRV.DE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQX.DE.

IQQX.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SXRV.DE is Nasdaq-100. IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50, while SXRV.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQX.DE and 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQX.DE and SXRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer