PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQX.DE achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than H410.DE's 27.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQX.DE has underperformed H410.DE with an annualized return of 6.29%, while H410.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.


IQQX.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
13.33%
6M
13.65%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
6.29%

H410.DE

1D
-1.81%
1M
3.71%
YTD
27.49%
6M
27.95%
1Y
49.05%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
13.33%14.78%12.48%8.98%2.81%11.77%-18.85%16.80%-11.26%2.03%
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
27.49%18.61%13.89%4.66%-13.80%3.98%7.04%21.02%-11.31%21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQX.DE and H410.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.67

The correlation between IQQX.DE and H410.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQX.DE
IQQX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

H410.DE
H410.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
H410.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H410.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
H410.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
H410.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
H410.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQX.DEH410.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.51

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.55

4.75

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.94

17.19

+3.75

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the H410.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQX.DE and H410.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQX.DEH410.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.82

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.49

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.53

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.41

-0.20

Drawdowns

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQX.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.45%, which is greater than H410.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQX.DE and H410.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQX.DEH410.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.45%

-36.25%

-33.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-10.48%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.28%

-18.96%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-23.76%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.78%

-31.68%

-11.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-2.80%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-10.25%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.90%

-1.26%

Volatility

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) is 2.93%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that IQQX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H410.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQX.DEH410.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

7.30%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

14.96%

-6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.06%

17.70%

-6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.01%

16.64%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

18.17%

-2.42%

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than H410.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQX.DE vs. H410.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than H410.DE's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
1.60%2.00%2.40%2.58%3.11%2.00%1.69%2.03%2.20%1.62%1.71%2.28%
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
3.12%3.64%4.84%5.36%6.66%4.62%3.16%4.85%5.09%4.16%4.03%4.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQX.DE and H410.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H410.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H410.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQX.DE.

IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50, while H410.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQX.DE and 0.15% for H410.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQX.DE and H410.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer