PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQW.DE) and Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQW.DE achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly lower than AMEC.DE's 29.32% return.


IQQW.DE

1D
0.43%
1M
1.51%
6M
12.34%
YTD
12.38%
1Y
23.86%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
12.69%

AMEC.DE

1D
0.67%
1M
-2.30%
6M
29.49%
YTD
29.32%
1Y
40.64%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQQW.DE
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
12.38%7.59%25.52%19.92%-13.90%32.21%5.13%3.22%
AMEC.DE
Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF
29.32%9.65%16.27%1.43%-18.74%9.30%9.10%3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQW.DE and AMEC.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.80

The correlation between IQQW.DE and AMEC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQW.DE
IQQW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IQQW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEC.DE
AMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQW.DE) and Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQW.DEAMEC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

4.48

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.30

13.32

+0.98

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQW.DE and AMEC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQW.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.35%, which is greater than AMEC.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQW.DE and AMEC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQW.DEAMEC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.35%

-35.49%

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-9.02%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.66%

-24.98%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.66%

-27.34%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-4.18%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.01%

-11.39%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

3.04%

-1.38%

Volatility

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQW.DE) is 3.28%, while Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that IQQW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQW.DEAMEC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

7.93%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

14.85%

-6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

18.73%

-7.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

17.80%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

19.32%

-4.29%

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQW.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEC.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQW.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while AMEC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMEC.DE
Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQW.DE
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.86%0.95%1.05%1.32%1.49%1.01%1.21%1.60%1.84%1.66%1.70%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQW.DE and AMEC.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMEC.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEC.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQQW.DE.

IQQW.DE tracks MSCI World Index, while AMEC.DE tracks Solactive Smart City. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IQQW.DE and 0.35% for AMEC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQW.DE and AMEC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer