AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMEC.DE (Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF) and XDWL.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D) are both Global Equities funds - AMEC.DE tracks the Solactive Smart City while XDWL.DE tracks the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMEC.DE returned 6.68%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for XDWL.DE. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMEC.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XDWL.DE.

Performance

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEC.DE achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than XDWL.DE's 10.94% return.

AMEC.DE

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 10.78%
• YTD: 30.58%
• 6M: 29.29%
• 1Y: 46.14%
• 3Y*: 17.35%
• 5Y*: 6.68%
• 10Y*: —

XDWL.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 10.94%
• 6M: 11.37%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 17.62%
• 5Y*: 12.94%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMEC.DE Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF	30.58%	9.65%	16.27%	1.43%	-18.74%	9.30%	9.10%	3.62%
XDWL.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D	10.94%	7.90%	26.08%	20.26%	-13.81%	32.92%	5.44%	4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEC.DE and XDWL.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019	0.80

The correlation between AMEC.DE and XDWL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEC.DE

AMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
AMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

XDWL.DE

XDWL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 70
XDWL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XDWL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
XDWL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XDWL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XDWL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMEC.DE	XDWL.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.14	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	2.99	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.40	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.09	3.66	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.11	14.44	+1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the XDWL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEC.DE and XDWL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMEC.DE	XDWL.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.14	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.91	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.68	-0.24

Drawdowns

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than XDWL.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEC.DE and XDWL.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMEC.DE	XDWL.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.49%	-33.65%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-6.49%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.98%	-21.63%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.33%	-21.63%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.29%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.50%	-4.56%	-6.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	1.65%	+1.21%

Volatility

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that AMEC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMEC.DE	XDWL.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	2.62%	+4.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	7.73%	+5.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.36%	11.09%	+6.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.51%	14.14%	+3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	15.12%	+4.10%

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEC.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMEC.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMEC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDWL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AMEC.DE Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XDWL.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D	1.17%	1.28%	1.65%	1.58%	1.77%	2.08%	1.95%	1.98%	1.40%	1.94%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMEC.DE and XDWL.DE in my portfolio?

AMEC.DE and XDWL.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMEC.DE or XDWL.DE?

On fees, XDWL.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMEC.DE or XDWL.DE?

XDWL.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AMEC.DE.

What is the main difference between AMEC.DE and XDWL.DE?

AMEC.DE tracks Solactive Smart City, while XDWL.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AMEC.DE and 0.12% for XDWL.DE.