PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 65.29% return, which is significantly higher than XBAS.DE's 18.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE has outperformed XBAS.DE with an annualized return of 20.32%, while XBAS.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.33% annualized return.


IQQT.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
-3.41%
6M
56.26%
YTD
65.29%
1Y
90.36%
3Y*
39.09%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
20.32%

XBAS.DE

1D
1.29%
1M
11.85%
6M
16.83%
YTD
18.59%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQT.DE
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
65.29%17.20%30.72%24.49%-25.21%38.46%22.43%39.64%-5.82%12.48%
XBAS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc)
18.59%15.70%34.37%0.79%-4.51%12.71%-13.87%19.13%-5.74%17.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQT.DE and XBAS.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.55

The correlation between IQQT.DE and XBAS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQT.DE
IQQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IQQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAS.DE
XBAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XBAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQT.DEXBAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.37

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.02

4.04

+4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.19

10.09

+14.09

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the XBAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQT.DE and XBAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, which is greater than XBAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and XBAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQT.DEXBAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.48%

-36.43%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-7.14%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.65%

-20.54%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.51%

-20.54%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

-36.43%

+3.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.69%

0.00%

-9.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-10.44%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

2.86%

+0.86%

Volatility

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAS.DE) at 3.49%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQT.DEXBAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.78%

3.49%

+8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.89%

10.14%

+12.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.94%

13.92%

+13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.57%

15.71%

+6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.13%

16.54%

+4.59%

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAS.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQT.DE vs. XBAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while XBAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQT.DE
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
0.92%1.51%1.36%2.17%3.61%1.31%1.80%2.17%2.76%2.74%2.91%3.26%
XBAS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQT.DE and XBAS.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBAS.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.

IQQT.DE is categorized as Taiwan Equities, while XBAS.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while XBAS.DE tracks MSCI Singapore Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.50% for XBAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and XBAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer