IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and FVSJ.DE (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while FVSJ.DE tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQT.DE returned 22.82%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for FVSJ.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FVSJ.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than FVSJ.DE's 45.45% return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
FVSJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 45.45%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- 72.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -12.36% |
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 45.45% | 15.41% | 14.01% | 8.23% | -7.58% | 13.71% | -3.67% | 13.83% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and FVSJ.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and FVSJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (5 years) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
FVSJ.DE
IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.64 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 6.17 | +6.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 23.31 | +12.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 3.60 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.94 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than FVSJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and FVSJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -26.95% | -30.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.93% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -21.76% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -21.76% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.76% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -5.16% | -7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.16% | -0.02% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE) at 9.05%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVSJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 9.05% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 17.69% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 20.43% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 15.44% | +6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 17.16% | +3.64% |
IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FVSJ.DE's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while FVSJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and FVSJ.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FVSJ.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVSJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while FVSJ.DE tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.14% for FVSJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and FVSJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer