PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IQQT.DE having a 70.08% return and FLXT.DE slightly lower at 69.39%.


IQQT.DE

1D
-1.61%
1M
12.50%
YTD
70.08%
6M
72.22%
1Y
110.41%
3Y*
40.38%
5Y*
22.82%
10Y*
21.81%

FLXT.DE

1D
-1.70%
1M
13.04%
YTD
69.39%
6M
72.01%
1Y
113.39%
3Y*
41.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IQQT.DE
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
70.08%17.20%30.72%24.49%-21.99%
FLXT.DE
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
69.39%19.89%30.42%25.56%-22.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQT.DE and FLXT.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2022

0.97

The correlation between IQQT.DE and FLXT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQT.DE
IQQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IQQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXT.DE
FLXT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLXT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQT.DEFLXT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.78

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.46

12.64

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.53

38.64

-3.11

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.62, which is comparable to the FLXT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQT.DE and FLXT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQT.DEFLXT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.62

4.92

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.15

-0.66

Drawdowns

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than FLXT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and FLXT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQT.DEFLXT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.60%

-31.16%

-26.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-9.05%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.65%

-31.16%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.86%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.71%

-8.18%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.97%

+0.17%

Volatility

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) at 9.61%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQT.DEFLXT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

9.61%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.53%

18.65%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.10%

23.26%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.89%

21.86%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.80%

21.86%

-1.06%

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQT.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while FLXT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXT.DE
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQT.DE
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
0.89%1.51%1.36%2.17%3.61%1.31%1.80%2.17%2.76%2.74%2.91%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IQQT.DE and FLXT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FLXT.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXT.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.

IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while FLXT.DE tracks FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.19% for FLXT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and FLXT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer