IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQT.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQT.DE returned 22.82%/yr vs -1.29%/yr for EUNA.DE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 0.03% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.46% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.36% | -13.52% | -2.37% | 3.70% | 5.06% | -1.17% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, IQQT.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
EUNA.DE
IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.06 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 0.43 | +12.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 1.18 | +34.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 0.34 | +4.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | -0.28 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | -0.05 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -17.79% | -39.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -2.75% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -4.02% | -27.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -17.03% | -15.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -8.66% | +7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -6.76% | -5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 0.99% | +2.15% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 1.35% | +8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 2.82% | +16.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 3.46% | +20.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 4.64% | +17.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 4.27% | +16.53% |
IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer