IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and DX2S.DE (Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while DX2S.DE tracks the S&P/ASX 200. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE returned 21.81%/yr vs 7.90%/yr for DX2S.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DX2S.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than DX2S.DE's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE has outperformed DX2S.DE with an annualized return of 21.81%, while DX2S.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.90% annualized return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
DX2S.DE
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
DX2S.DE Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D | 8.70% | 4.55% | 8.00% | 7.90% | -3.18% | 19.42% | 0.73% | 25.78% | -8.43% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and DX2S.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2008 | 0.57 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and DX2S.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
DX2S.DE
IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (DX2S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | DX2S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.17 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 1.53 | +10.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 4.54 | +31.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | DX2S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 0.94 | +3.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.37 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.41 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.27 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, roughly equal to the maximum DX2S.DE drawdown of -55.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and DX2S.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | DX2S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -55.30% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -8.41% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -23.42% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -23.42% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -43.65% | +11.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.77% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -9.14% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.84% | +0.30% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (DX2S.DE) at 4.24%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DX2S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | DX2S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 4.24% | +5.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 10.89% | +8.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 13.68% | +10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 16.90% | +4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 19.26% | +1.54% |
IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DX2S.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. DX2S.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than DX2S.DE's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DX2S.DE Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.52% | 2.75% | 3.13% | 3.81% | 5.44% | 2.05% | 5.01% | 3.62% | 3.60% | 3.63% | 4.04% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and DX2S.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DX2S.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DX2S.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while DX2S.DE tracks S&P/ASX 200. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.50% for DX2S.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and DX2S.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer