IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and DBX8.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while DBX8.DE tracks the MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE returned 21.81%/yr vs 16.74%/yr for DBX8.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBX8.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly lower than DBX8.DE's 109.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE has outperformed DBX8.DE with an annualized return of 21.81%, while DBX8.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 16.74% annualized return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
DBX8.DE
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- 11.65%
- YTD
- 109.21%
- 6M
- 122.15%
- 1Y
- 217.95%
- 3Y*
- 45.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.74%
IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
DBX8.DE Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 109.21% | 77.39% | -18.45% | 15.93% | -23.95% | -0.54% | 30.13% | 14.92% | -18.04% | 28.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and DBX8.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2007 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and DBX8.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
DBX8.DE
IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.75 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 10.67 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 32.63 | +2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 5.17 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.72 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.66 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.31 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, smaller than the maximum DBX8.DE drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and DBX8.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -68.01% | +10.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -21.19% | +12.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -30.70% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -41.29% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -41.89% | +9.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -5.82% | +4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -17.55% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 6.94% | -3.80% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) is 10.13%, while Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a volatility of 17.08%. This indicates that IQQT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBX8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 17.08% | -6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 33.48% | -13.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 43.73% | -19.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 27.53% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 26.03% | -5.23% |
IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DBX8.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while DBX8.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX8.DE Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and DBX8.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX8.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX8.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while DBX8.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.45% for DBX8.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and DBX8.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer