PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQQ vs. QCAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQQ vs. QCAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than QCAP's 5.23% return.


IQQQ

1D
-0.30%
1M
9.88%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.39%
1Y
38.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCAP

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.92%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ vs. QCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
18.72%17.11%19.84%
QCAP
FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April
5.23%7.13%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ and QCAP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.89

The correlation between IQQQ and QCAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQQ vs. QCAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ
IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

QCAP
QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ vs. QCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQQQCAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.99

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

13.50

-10.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

67.84

-55.43

IQQQ vs. QCAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is lower than the QCAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQQ and QCAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQQQCAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

4.17

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Drawdowns

IQQQ vs. QCAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, which is greater than QCAP's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ and QCAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQQQCAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.41%

-9.17%

-11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-0.82%

-10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.08%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-0.52%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

0.16%

+2.97%

Volatility

IQQQ vs. QCAP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) at 0.99%. This indicates that IQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQQQCAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

0.99%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

1.93%

+9.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

2.69%

+12.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

8.73%

+9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

8.73%

+9.84%

IQQQ vs. QCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QCAP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQQ vs. QCAP - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, while QCAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
4.42%10.34%7.27%
QCAP
FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQQ and QCAP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQQQ has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to QCAP (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQQQ dropped -20.41% vs QCAP's -9.17%.

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 38.70% vs 11.06% for QCAP. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, QCAP has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 38.70% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.00% for QCAP.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IQQQ and 0.90% for QCAP.

QCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQQ and QCAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer