PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQQ vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQQ vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ achieves a 14.52% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -27.10% return.


IQQQ

1D
-0.34%
1M
-2.82%
6M
13.69%
YTD
14.52%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITO

1D
0.57%
1M
-2.64%
6M
-34.63%
YTD
-27.10%
1Y
-46.42%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.52%17.11%14.82%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-27.10%-11.19%36.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ and BITO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQQ vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ
IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQQBITODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.82

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

-0.85

+3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

-1.38

+9.19

IQQQ vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQQ and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQQ vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ and BITO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQQBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.41%

-77.86%

+57.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-54.47%

+43.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-49.72%

+45.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-37.05%

+33.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

33.76%

-30.38%

Volatility

IQQQ vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) is 7.26%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 11.45%. This indicates that IQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQQBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

11.45%

-4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

34.67%

-20.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

44.18%

-26.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

54.82%

-35.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

54.82%

-35.68%

IQQQ vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQQ vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than BITO's 59.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
59.70%78.29%61.59%15.14%
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
5.21%10.34%7.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQQ and BITO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITO has higher volatility (11.45%) compared to IQQQ (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQQQ dropped -20.41% vs BITO's -77.86%.

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 26.33% vs -46.42% for BITO. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 26.33% return vs -46.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 59.70%, compared with 5.21% for IQQQ.

IQQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IQQQ and 0.95% for BITO.

IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQQ and BITO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer